Grewal
examines transnational formations inside and outside of the Unites States by
looking at “the production of middle class Asian Indian and American subjects
in the 1990s” (1). She uses many
different modes of analysis, but each larger scale example/chapter seems to boil
down the idea of subject formation, whether a consumer of Barbie, readers of
Indian novels, or someone who utilizes a helpful organization. Neoliberal policies intersect with gender,
race, class, nationalism, and location to create a subject in a particular
form.
One
particularly interesting point of her study involves the imagines creation of
what is American, and how that idea has been propagated through neoliberal
policies and consumer culture. There
seems to be a difference between the United States, as an imperialist,
powerful, neoliberal entity, and America as a multicultural, melting pot whose
way of life is idealized and something to achieve. In the past few weeks we have seen how
neoliberal and imperialist policies have affected countries differently. The ICIs were different from what happened
with families in the Philippines, and those were different from the view of tourism
given in Kincaid’s work. Then again here
we see something different with the way Indian consumers reacted. They all show complex ties of power and
subjugation and reveal “transnational connectivities” that are important to
Grewal’s work.
Grewal
states that the United States was able to promote the power of whiteness, but
also the idea of being a global nation into what it meant to be American
(9). This is most apparent in her
example of white Barbie in an Indian sari.
The influence of the World Bank and IMF in India during the 1980s opened
up India’s economy to foreign governments, and gave those governments access to
new markets and consumers. This chapter
also shows how the American ideal of whiteness is not always successful in its
pure form. Barbie sales in India did not
take off until Barbie wore an Indian sari, which shows negotiation occurring
within the transnational markets (80-120).
So, while Barbie was still white,
the doll had to take on a multicultural quality (the sari) in order to produce transnational
consumers for Mattel.
Briana
No comments:
Post a Comment