This week’s reading was based on the book, Killing with
Kindness by Mark Schuller. In his book, Schuller explores the
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that bring foreign aid to countries like
Haiti and how they fell short after the tragic earthquake that hit the small
country in January of 2011. In particular he looks at two women led
organizations, Sove Lavi (“saving lives”) and Fanm Tet Ansanm (“women united”)
and he looks specifically at their “civil infrastructure”, “the interrelated
set of relationships between and among various stakeholder groups of a given
social grouping” (177). By peeling back the layers of these two organizations,
the reader gets a look into this “civil infrastructure” and see how foreign aid
organizations are in some ways ran like businesses; some NGOs being funded by
private donors and others being funded by organizations with political agendas
in mind. Through Schuller’s work the reader gets to play detective and figure
out what happened? What went wrong? And who is accountable for the incident? In
comparison to other work written on Haiti, Schuller does a good job in telling
the whole story not just from an outsider’s perspective but from an insider’s
perspective as well, especially in regards to women. Something Chandra Mohanty
proclaims is missing from scholarly work written by Westerners about women from
developing countries especially in regards to violence against women. Mohanty’s
states in her article “Under Western Eyes”, “Women are defined consistently as
the victims of male control- the “sexually oppressed”. Although it is true that
the potential of male violence against women circumscribes and elucidates their
social position to a certain extent, defining women as archetypal victims
freezes them into “objects-who-defend-themselves,” men into
“subjects-who-perpetrate-violence”(339). This is not the case in Schuller’s
book, he includes this part of the story but allows the women to provide an
explanation of why it happens. Malya Villard a woman representing a victims
organization says this, “Rape or violence are directly connected with the
country’s economy. Sometimes a woman doesn’t have any earning power, which
makes her a victim.” (27) From this as the reader we get to see how some of
these NGOs, like Saving Lives and Women United came to be. They were meant to
help women, educate them about sex, help them talk to factory owners about the
conditions within the factories, but not be an answer to solving poverty which
we can see where everything went wrong.
Foreign aid is meant to be given to people in need to help
them temporarily through an unsalvageable situation, but how can it be helpful
if no one from the underclass receives the aid? In this situation, sometimes
they succeeded other times they failed, one organization in particular, Sove
Lavi (Saving Lives), failed a lot more than Fanm Tet Ansanm(Women United). When
the women asked for more help within the community they barely received any.
Which raises a question of why give money to a country that the poor will never
see? Sadly an answer is given at the end from a USAID representative, “The goal
is to spend it all and say, ‘ See, we’ve done all we can for Haiti.’” (187).
This only leaves me questions which remain unanswered. How do we get the aid to
the poor? Should we stop sending money? Who is at fault? The organizations? The
donors? The recepients? From the stories shared in Schuller’s book we as the
reader can see the importance of having a voice and paying attention to the
money we give in hopes to help others. This was definitely a lesson well
appreciated.
No comments:
Post a Comment