The most striking part of chapters 5 and 6 in Gina Ulysse’s Downtown Ladies was the way she gendered
spaces and places. She uses Kingston, Jamaica as a reference point to further
explain the difference between downtown and uptown. Rather than having explicit
boundaries isolating downtown and uptown from one another, the two areas are
instead given characteristics according to the people living there and their
characteristics. Ulysse associates the downtown area with masculinity and
violence. Not only are the men considered more inherently “masculine”, but
Ulysse states the women must also be tougher, in some way. She says the tough,
rugged behavior is expected of an ICI, as they have no other way to survive in
downtown. Are all places equally gendered? Would different locations label
different areas with differing genders?
To me, it
seems as though the perception of gendering places and behaviors is directly
linked to powerful. ICIs, for example, must be considered powerful to be
successful. Massey’s article seems to articulate that we make power hierarchies
BECAUSE of the gendering of places. Male’s privilege to power in Jamaica is
directly linked to the survival habits of women in the downtown, “masculine”
area. Massey also, however, looks at the intersection of race and class rather
than explicitly gender. Where does it begin? Is the power stemming from gender
and class constructs? Or are these constructs stemming from the dynamic of
power?
No comments:
Post a Comment